* Indicates subgroups not included as separate
sub-populations in the Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) calculation.
| School |
Reading |
Math |
| 2004-05 |
2003-04 |
2004-05 |
2003-04 |
| Grade 6 |
49 |
53 |
33 |
41 |
| Grade 7 |
48 |
50 |
47 |
43 |
| Grade 8 |
33 |
40 |
55 |
52 |
| Grade 9 |
30 |
27 |
55 |
47 |
| Grade 10 |
20 |
27 |
60 |
65 |
| District |
Reading
|
Math
|
| 2004-05 |
2003-04 |
2004-05 |
2003-04 |
| Grade3 |
71 |
67 |
69 |
64 |
| Grade4 |
72 |
72 |
65 |
65 |
| Grade5 |
68 |
61 |
61 |
56 |
| Grade 6 |
56 |
57 |
47 |
45 |
| Grade 7 |
56 |
55 |
54 |
50 |
| Grade 8 |
45 |
46 |
60 |
57 |
| Grade 9 |
37 |
34 |
59 |
54 |
| Grade 10 |
31 |
33 |
62 |
63 |
| State Totals |
Reading
|
Math
|
| 2004-05 |
2003-04 |
2004-05 |
2003-04 |
| Grade3 |
68 |
66 |
69 |
64 |
| Grade4 |
72 |
70 |
64 |
64 |
| Grade5 |
66 |
59 |
58 |
53 |
| Grade 6 |
56 |
55 |
48 |
46 |
| Grade 7 |
53 |
53 |
53 |
50 |
| Grade 8 |
44 |
45 |
59 |
57 |
| Grade 9 |
37 |
32 |
59 |
54 |
| Grade 10 |
32 |
34 |
63 |
62 |
NRT Results |
Subject (Grade) |
Number Tested |
Median |
National District |
Percentile Rank State |
| Reading (Gr.3 ) |
|
|
50 |
50 |
| Mathematics (Gr. 3) |
|
|
66 |
62 |
| Reading (Gr4. ) |
|
|
53 |
55 |
| Mathematics (Gr.4 ) |
|
|
65 |
63 |
| Reading (Gr5. ) |
|
|
61 |
61 |
| Mathematics (Gr.5 ) |
|
|
65 |
64 |
| Reading (Gr.6 ) |
128 |
42 |
54 |
54 |
| Mathematics (Gr.6 ) |
129 |
49 |
60 |
61 |
| Reading (Gr.7 ) |
131 |
47 |
57 |
56 |
| Mathematics (Gr. 7) |
131 |
57 |
65 |
65 |
| Reading (Gr.8 ) |
133 |
53 |
67 |
67 |
| Mathematics (Gr.8 ) |
133 |
61 |
66 |
67 |
| Reading (Gr.9 ) |
431 |
57 |
63 |
63 |
| Mathematics (Gr.9 ) |
429 |
65 |
70 |
71 |
| Reading (Gr. 10) |
335 |
48 |
56 |
61 |
| Mathematics (Gr.10 ) |
335 |
48 |
56 |
58 |
*A pound sign(#) in a cell indicates suppressed data where
fewer than 10 students were tested.
SCHOOL SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT
Schools and communitites must provide an environment that
is drug fee and protects the health, safety, and
civil rights of everyone in the school.
School Environment Safety: Reported Incidents*
The most recent full-year school-level data on reported incidents
is available at the Florida School Indicators Report website
at http://info.doe.state.fl.us/fsir. (See "Incidents of
Crime and Violence.") District-level reports are available
at www.firn.edu.doe/besss/sesir/sesir0304.htm. School Evaluation
for "Unsafe School Choice Option" Requirements, Preliminary
Evaluation.
The No Child Left Behind Act provides for an Unsafe School
Choice Option, which ensures that students who attend a school
that has been identified as persistently dangerous are allowed
the option of attending another school within the same district.
For the 2004-05 school year, no Florida public school was
identified as persistently dangerous.*
*pending review of complete full year data.
TEACHERS AND STAFF
Schools, districts, and the state ensure that teachers and
staff are professionally qualified. School boards must provide
a learning environment conducive to teaching and learning.
New Staff
The table shows the number and percentage of instructional
staff and school-based administrators who were newly hired
at this school in 2004-05.
Staff Type |
Total Number for 2004-05 |
Number Newly Hired for 2004-05 |
School % |
District % |
State % |
| Instructional Staff |
101 |
21 |
20.8 |
24.9 |
21.2 |
| School-Based Administrators |
5 |
1 |
20.8 |
31.2 |
20.4 |
| Total |
106 |
22 |
20.8 |
25.2 |
21.2 |
The Professional Qualifications of Teachers
|
|
School % |
District % |
State % |
| Degree Level |
Number |
2004-05 |
2003-04 |
2004-05 |
2003-04 |
2004-05 |
2003-04 |
| Bachelor's Degree |
67 |
72.0 |
65.9 |
68.7 |
67.6 |
65.2 |
64.8 |
| Master's Degree |
22 |
23.7 |
29.7 |
29.2 |
30.0 |
32.1 |
32.4 |
| Specialist Degree |
1 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
1.7 |
1.8 |
| Doctorate |
3 |
3.2 |
3.3 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
.9 |
| Total All Degrees |
93 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Percentage of Teachers Teaching with Emergency or Provisional
Credentials
Florida has no non-certified teachers, although some teachers
may be temporarily assigned to areas outside their
of specialization. Data on classes taught by teachers
out of field is provided in the following areas.
In-Field and Out-of-Field Teachers
The following chart shows the percentage of core academic
classes taught by teachers teaching in-field compared to the
percentage of classes taught by teachers teaching out-of-field.
When a teacher in a district school system is assigned teaching
duties in a class dealing with subject matter that is outside
the field in which the teacher is certified, outside the field
that was the applicant’s minor field of study, or outside
the field in which the applicant has demonstrated sufficient
subject area expertise, as determined by district’s school
board policy in the subject area to be taught, that teacher
is teaching out-of-field." Core academic subjects are
English, reading, language arts, mathematics, science, foreign
languages, civics, government, economics, arts, history, and
geography.
| |
School % |
District % |
State % |
| Percentage of Classes withTeachers Teaching
In-Field |
100 |
98.1 |
94.5 |
| Percentage of Classes withTeachers Teaching Out-of-Field |
0.0 |
1.9 |
5.5 |
Classes Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers
The chart below shows the percentage of classes not taught
by "Highly Qualified teachers" in core academic subjects
as defined in federal statute. A "highly qualified teacher" has
earned at least a bachelor’s degree and holds a Florida
teaching certificate with appropriate certification for each
core academic area of assignment. Federal law requires that
all public elementary, middle, and secondary teachers of core
academic subjects meet the federal definition of “highly
qualified" no later than 2005-06 school year. Core academic
subjects are English, reading, language arts, mathematics,
science, foreign languages, civics, government, economics,
arts, history, and geography.
|
School % |
District % |
All Schools |
State % High Poverty Schools* |
Low Povery Schools* |
| Classes not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers |
11.4 |
7.3 |
8.0 |
9.2 |
5.7 |
*High poverty schools are schools ranking in the top 25% of
schools based on the percentage of students eligible for free-reduced
lunch. Low poverty schools rank in the bottom quartile of schools
based on free-reduced -price lunch eligibility. That is, low
poverty schools have the lowest enrollment in free/reduced-price
lunch as a percentage of total membership.